AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 75, Issue 10 1204-1208, Copyright © 1985 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Khoury, M J
Right arrow Articles by Chase, G A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Khoury, M J
Right arrow Articles by Chase, G A
Epidemiologic evaluation of screening for risk factors: application to genetic screening.

M J Khoury, C A Newill and G A Chase

To assess the usefulness of screening for risk factors, we derived arithmetic relationships between screening parameters (sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value PPV) and risk factor frequency, disease frequency and relative risk. We evaluated these relationships in the special case of genetic markers and disease susceptibility. It can be shown that even in the face of very large relative risks, sensitivity and positive predictive value are affected by the relative magnitude of disease and genetic marker frequencies. When the genetic marker is less frequent than the disease, PPV increases with increasing relative risk but sensitivity remains low. When the genetic marker is more frequent than the disease, sensitivity increases with increasing relative risk but PPV remains low. When marker and disease frequencies are equal, both PPV and sensitivity increase with increasing relative risks, but very high relative risks (greater than 100) have to be obtained for rare diseases. Depending on the goals of the screening program, these relationships can be used to predict the relative magnitudes of false positives (low PPV) and false negatives (low sensitivity). This approach can be generalized to evaluate nongenetic risk factors in screening programs as well.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
M. J Khoury, J. Little, M. Gwinn, and J. P. Ioannidis
On the synthesis and interpretation of consistent but weak gene-disease associations in the era of genome-wide association studies
Int. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2007; 36(2): 439 - 445.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
E. C. McCanlies, K. Kreiss, M. Andrew, and A. Weston
HLA-DPB1 and Chronic Beryllium Disease: A HuGE Review
Am. J. Epidemiol., March 1, 2003; 157(5): 388 - 398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
N. A. Holtzman and T. M. Marteau
Will Genetics Revolutionize Medicine?
N. Engl. J. Med., July 13, 2000; 343(2): 141 - 144.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American Public Health Association