HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Horn, S D Articles by Horn, R A Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Horn, S D Articles by Horn, R A

Severity of illness within DRGs: impact on prospective payment.

S D Horn, P D Sharkey, A F Chambers and R A Horn

This study compares the financial impact of a Diagnosis Related Group (DRG) prospective payment system with that of a Severity of Illness-adjusted DRG prospective payment system. The data base of about 106,000 discharges is from 15 hospitals, all of which had a Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) DRG case mix index greater than 1. In order to pool the data over the 15 hospitals, all charges were converted to costs, normalized to Fiscal Year 1983, and adjusted for medical education and wage levels. The findings showed that, for the study population as a whole, DRGs explained 28 per cent of the variability in resource use per case while Severity of Illness-adjusted DRGs explained 61 per cent of the variability in resource use per case. When we simulated prospective payment systems based on DRGs and on Severity-adjusted DRGs, we found that the financial impact of the two systems differed by very little in some hospitals and by as much as 35 per cent of total operating costs in other hospitals. Thus, even with a data set that is relatively homogeneous (with respect to the HCFA DRG case mix index definition of hospitals), we found substantial inequities in payment when DRGs were not adjusted for Severity of Illness. These findings suggest that, with a more representative set of hospitals, the difference between unadjusted and Severity-adjusted DRG-based prospective payment could be greater than 35 per cent of a hospital's total operating costs.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. B. Dyeson, C. Watkins, and L. Jolly Investigating Delay in Social Service Referral as a Predictor of Unattained Social Service Goals in Home Health Care Home Health Care Management Practice, October 1, 2005; 17(6): 456 - 466. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. B. Dyeson The Home Health Care Team: What Can We Learn From the Hospice Experience? Home Health Care Management Practice, February 1, 2005; 17(2): 125 - 127. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. F. Willson, S. D. Horn, J. O. Hendley, R. Smout, and J. Gassaway Effect of Practice Variation on Resource Utilization in Infants Hospitalized for Viral Lower Respiratory Illness Pediatrics, October 1, 2001; 108(4): 851 - 855. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. P. Duncan Uncompensated Hospital Care Med Care Res Rev, September 1, 1992; 49(3): 265 - 330. [PDF]

				M. K. Chapko, J. L. Ehreth, and S. Hedrick Methods of Determining the Cost of Health Care in the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Centers and Other Nonpriced Settings Eval Health Prof, September 1, 1991; 14(3): 282 - 303. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. A. Prescott, K. L. Soeken, and J. W. Ryan Measuring Patient Intensity: A Reliability Study Eval Health Prof, September 1, 1989; 12(3): 255 - 269. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. B. Aronow Severity-of-Illness Measurement: Applications in Quality Assurance and Utilization Review Med Care Res Rev, January 1, 1988; 45(2): 339 - 366. [PDF]