AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 75, Issue 1 67-68, Copyright © 1985 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weiss, N S
Right arrow Articles by Chow, W H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weiss, N S
Right arrow Articles by Chow, W H
Control definition in case-control studies of ectopic pregnancy.

N S Weiss, J R Daling and W H Chow

In case-control studies of ectopic pregnancy, the optimal sampling frame for control selection is influenced heavily by the hypothesis being tested. The selection of women completing an intrauterine pregnancy, a common choice for a control group in studies to date, is appropriate only if the hypothesis does not relate to exposures that selectively prevent an intrauterine pregnancy (e.g., use of an intrauterine device (IUD) at the time of conception). Even for other exposures, the selection of such women can yield misleading results if the exposure is related to the likelihood of completion of the intrauterine pregnancy. On the other hand, the selection of nonpregnant women as controls, while permitting a valid evaluation of the risk associated with exposure such as the use of an IUD, can introduce a substantial degree of incomparability between cases and controls with regard to other contraceptive practices and their correlates. Whichever of the two sampling frames that is chosen, an appreciation of these potential biases can lead to ways of tailoring the selection of individual controls to minimize the magnitude of the bias.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
J. Bouyer, J. Coste, T. Shojaei, J.-L. Pouly, H. Fernandez, L. Gerbaud, and N. Job-Spira
Risk Factors for Ectopic Pregnancy: A Comprehensive Analysis Based on a Large Case-Control, Population-based Study in France
Am. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2003; 157(3): 185 - 194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
L.M. Irvine and M.E. Setchell
Declining incidence of ectopic pregnancy in a UK city health district between 1990 and 1999
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2001; 16(10): 2230 - 2234.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American Public Health Association