AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 74, Issue 6 569-573, Copyright © 1984 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Deyo, R A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Deyo, R A
Pitfalls in measuring the health status of Mexican Americans: comparative validity of the English and Spanish Sickness Impact Profile.

R A Deyo

We tested a Spanish translation of the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) in a clinical study of low back pain, which included non-Hispanic patients (Group I), Mexican Americans who used the English SIP (Group II), and Mexican Americans who used the Spanish SIP (Group III). The reliability and clinical validity of responses by these three groups were compared. Internal consistency of responses by all three groups was excellent ( Cronbach 's alpha for the overall SIP = .93 - .95). When construct validity was tested by correlating SIP scores with several clinical measures of disease severity, however, important differences emerged. Group I responses appeared to be highly valid, while group III responses did not; Group II responses appeared reasonably valid, but intermediate between the other groups. These differences appear unlikely to be due to clinical differences, interviewing, or translational problems and seem to parallel the groups' levels of "acculturation." It may be that certain aspects of acculturation, including familiarity with questionnaire research, critically affect the validity of responses to this questionnaire.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
International Journal of Social PsychiatryHome page
F. J. Trompenaars, E. D. Masthoff, G. L. Van Heck, J. de Vries, and P. P. Hodiamont
Relationships between social functioning and quality of life in a population of Dutch adult psychiatric outpatients.
International Journal of Social Psychiatry, January 1, 2007; 53(1): 36 - 47.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
M. D. Klinnert, M. R. Price, A. H. Liu, and J. L. Robinson
Unraveling the Ecology of Risks for Early Childhood Asthma Among Ethnically Diverse Families in the Southwest
Am J Public Health, May 1, 2002; 92(5): 792 - 798.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hispanic Journal of Behavioral SciencesHome page
J. S. Reichman
Language-Specific Response Patterns and Subjective Assessment of Health: A Sociolinguistic Analysis
Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, August 1, 1997; 19(3): 353 - 368.
[Abstract]


Home page
West J Nurs ResHome page
F. Munet-Vilaro
Technical Notes: The Challenge of Cross-Cultural Nursing Research
West J Nurs Res, February 1, 1988; 10(1): 112 - 116.
[PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1984 by the American Public Health Association