AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 74, Issue 6 549-554, Copyright © 1984 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peoples, M D
Right arrow Articles by Daughtry, G L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Peoples, M D
Right arrow Articles by Daughtry, G L
Evaluation of the effects of the North Carolina Improved Pregnancy Outcome Project: implications for state-level decision-making.

M D Peoples, R C Grimson and G L Daughtry

This study was designed to assess the effects of the North Carolina Improved Pregnancy Outcome (IPO) Project on use of prenatal care and incidence of low birthweight among its primarily Black registrants . Weighted least squares and stratified analysis procedures were used to scrutinize vital statistics data for subpopulation effects. IPO services were received by 51.7 per cent of Black women in the counties served by the project. For all Black registrants , the risk of receiving less than adequate prenatal care was 55.1 per cent of that of the comparison group. For Black teenage registrants , the risk was even less: 37.2 per cent of that of the comparison group. Nevertheless, no corresponding effects on the incidence of low birthweight could be detected. The evaluation methods used in this study can be applied to programs for mothers and infants in other locales to generate useful and practical information for state-level decision-making.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
M. C. McCormick, L. W. Deal, B. L. Devaney, D. Chu, L. Moreno, and K. T. Raykovich
The Impact on Clients of a Community-Based Infant Mortality Reduction Program: The National Healthy Start Program Survey of Postpartum Women
Am J Public Health, December 1, 2001; 91(12): 1975 - 1977.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JOURNAL OF CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CAREHome page
C. I. Fogel
Pregnant Prisoners: Impact of Incarceration on Health and Health Care
Journal of Correctional Health Care, September 1, 1995; 2(2): 169 - 190.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
J. Huntington and F. A. Connell
For Every Dollar Spent -- The Cost-Savings Argument for Prenatal Care
N. Engl. J. Med., November 10, 1994; 331(19): 1303 - 1307.
[Full Text]


Home page
Eval RevHome page
S. L. Caudle and K. E. Newcomer
Grant Allocation Decision Rules: Expectations Versus Realities
Eval Rev, December 1, 1986; 10(6): 860 - 879.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eval RevHome page
W. R. Shadish JR and J. Reis
A Review of Studies of the Effectiveness of Programs To Improve Pregnancy Outcome
Eval Rev, December 1, 1984; 8(6): 747 - 776.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1984 by the American Public Health Association