AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 74, Issue 5 485-491, Copyright © 1984 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schulte, P A
Right arrow Articles by Ringen, K
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schulte, P A
Right arrow Articles by Ringen, K
Notification of workers at high risk: an emerging public health problem.

P A Schulte and K Ringen

During the last two decades, an increasing number of epidemiologic studies have found cohorts of workers to be at high risk of work-related chronic diseases, especially cancers. These studies frequently have led to the broad recognition of occupational hazards and eventually to the prevention of exposures to such hazards. Generally, however, the individual cohort members found to be at high risk have not been notified of study results, and programs of medical intervention or of palliative services directed at these individual workers have not been developed. Recently, the issue of whether or not workers have a right to be notified more directly about known health hazards to which they may have been exposed has emerged as a major, unresolved question in public health policy. Issues of concern include the criteria that should guide notifications; whom, when, and how to notify; and who should pay for notification and follow-up services. This commentary discusses the scientific, ethical, economic, and institutional aspects of worker notification, and describes three new demonstration projects that have provided notification and intervention for workers at high risk of bladder, colon, and lung cancer.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eval Health ProfHome page
A. V. Neale, R. Y. Demers, and P. C. Zemel
A Practical Guide for Estimating Dietary Fat and Fiber Using Limited Food Frequency Data
Eval Health Prof, September 1, 1992; 15(3): 341 - 349.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
J. C. Robinson
Labor Union Involvement in Occupational Safety and Health, 1957 1987
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, September 1, 1988; 13(3): 453 - 468.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
J. C. Robinson
Worker Responses to Workplace Hazards
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 1987; 12(4): 665 - 682.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1984 by the American Public Health Association