|
|
||||||||
The Baltimore City Primary Care Study examined the role of the urban office-based physician in the delivery of primary care. During the course of the study, questionnaires were completed by over 90 per cent of licensed physicians in the city, and data were collected from a sample of 16,000 patients. The study developed and assessed three approaches for the measurement of primary care. An empirical method was based upon information regarding the following characteristics of each visit: first contact visit, referral visit, specialized care visit, or principal care visit. A normative method was based on an assessment of the degree to which the practice provided care that was comprehensive, longitudinal, accessible, and family-centered. The third method used physicians' judgments as to the proportion of patients for whom they maintained ongoing responsibility for general medical care. All three methods produced the same categorization of different specialties as providing either primary, intermediate, or specialty care. As a group, primary care physicians included general and family physicians, pediatricians, and general internists. General surgeons and obstetrician/gynecologists have characteristics of both primary care and specialist care. All other physician groups have characteristics of specialists. Any of these methods or a combination of methods can be used to assess the extent to which the practice of a particular physician or group of physicians provides primary care.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Wilson, M. Roland, and C. Ham The contribution of general practice and the general practitioner to NHS patients J R Soc Med, January 1, 2006; 99(1): 24 - 28. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Marshall and T. Wilson Competition in general practice BMJ, November 19, 2005; 331(7526): 1196 - 1199. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Shi, J. Macinko, B. Starfield, R. Politzer, J. Wulu, and J. Xu Primary Care, Social Inequalities, and All-Cause, Heart Disease, and Cancer Mortality in US Counties, 1990 Am J Public Health, April 1, 2005; 95(4): 674 - 680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Shi, L. H. Green, and S. Kazakova Primary Care Experience and Racial Disparities in Self-Reported Health Status J Am Board Fam Med, November 1, 2004; 17(6): 443 - 452. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Tai-Seale Voting with Their Feet: Patient Exit and Intergroup Differences in Propensity for Switching Usual Source of Care Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, June 1, 2004; 29(3): 491 - 514. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Starfield and L. Shi The Medical Home, Access to Care, and Insurance: A Review of Evidence Pediatrics, May 1, 2004; 113(5/S1): 1493 - 1498. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Shi, J. Macinko, B. Starfield, J. Wulu, J. Regan, and R. Politzer The Relationship Between Primary Care, Income Inequality, and Mortality in US States, 1980-1995 J Am Board Fam Med, September 1, 2003; 16(5): 412 - 422. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Politzer, J. Yoon, L. Shi, R. G. Hughes, J. Regan, and M. H. Gaston Inequality in America: The Contribution of Health Centers in Reducing and Eliminating Disparities in Access to Care Med Care Res Rev, June 1, 2001; 58(2): 234 - 248. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Serwint and the Continuity Clinic Special Interest Group, Ambu Multisite Survey of Pediatric Residents' Continuity Experiences: Their Perceptions of the Clinical and Educational Opportunities Pediatrics, May 1, 2001; 107(5): 78e - 78. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
L. C. Garfunkel, R. S. Byrd, K. M. McConnochie, and P. Auinger Resident and Family Continuity in Pediatric Continuity Clinic: Nine Years of Observation Pediatrics, January 1, 1998; 101(1): 37 - 42. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Mottur-Pilson Primary Care as Form or Content? American Journal of Medical Quality, December 1, 1995; 10(4): 177 - 182. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |