HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Donovan, J E Articles by Jessor, R Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Donovan, J E Articles by Jessor, R

Problem drinking and the dimension of involvement with drugs: a Guttman scalogram analysis of adolescent drug use.

J E Donovan and R Jessor

Analyses of data from two nationwide surveys of high school students, one carried out in 1974 and the other in 1978, suggest that problem drinking may be seen as yet another step along an underlying dimension of involvement with both licit and illicit drugs. The dimension of involvement with drugs consists of the following levels: nonuse of alcohol or illicit drugs; nonproblem use of alcohol; marijuana use; problem drinking; use of pills (amphetamines, barbiturates, hallucinogenic drugs); and the use of "hard drugs" such as cocaine or heroin. The dimension possesses excellent Guttman-scale properties in both national samples as well as in subsamples differing in gender and ethnic background. The ordering of the levels of involvement was confirmed by the ordering of the alcohol-drug involvement groups based on their mean scores on measures of psychosocial proneness for involvement in problem behavior. The excessive use of a licit drug, i.e., problem drinking, appears to indicate greater involvement in drug use than does the use of an illicit drug, marijuana. This finding points to the importance of distinguishing between use and problem use of drugs in efforts to understand adolescent drug involvement.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Allen, W. A. Donohue, A. Griffin, D. Ryan, and M. M. M. Turner Comparing The Influence Of Parents And Peers On The Choice To Use Drugs: A Meta-Analytic Summary of the Literature Criminal Justice and Behavior, April 1, 2003; 30(2): 163 - 186. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Stice, J. Kirz, and C. Borbely Disentangling Adolescent Substance Use and Problem Use within a Clinical Sample Journal of Adolescent Research, March 1, 2002; 17(2): 122 - 142. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. J. Loveland-Cherry, S. Leech, V. B. Laetz, and T. E. Dielman Correlates of Alcohol Use and Misuse in Fourth-Grade Children: Psychosocial, Peer, Parental, and Family Factors Health Educ Behav, November 1, 1996; 23(4): 497 - 511. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. J. Genuis and S. K. Genuis Orgasm Without Organisms: Science or Propaganda? Clinical Pediatrics, January 1, 1996; 35(1): 10 - 17. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. GOLUB and B. D. JOHNSON Cohort Differences in Drug-Use Pathways to Crack among Current Crack Abusers in New York City Criminal Justice and Behavior, December 1, 1994; 21(4): 403 - 422. [Abstract]

				S. Feigelman, B. F. Stanton, and I. Ricardo Perceptions of Drug Selling and Drug Use among Urban Youths The Journal of Early Adolescence, August 1, 1993; 13(3): 267 - 284. [Abstract]

				A. W. Stacy, M. D. Newcomb, and P. M. Bentler Social Psychological Influences on Sensation Seeking from Adolescence to Adulthood Pers Soc Psychol Bull, December 1, 1991; 17(6): 701 - 708. [Abstract]

				L. M. Collins, N. Cliff, and C. W. Dent The Longitudinal Guttman Simplex: A New Methodology for Measurement of Dynamic Constructs in Longitudinal Panel Studies Applied Psychological Measurement, September 1, 1988; 12(3): 217 - 230. [Abstract]