AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 72, Issue 4 347-352, Copyright © 1982 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wagner, E H
Right arrow Articles by Graham, R M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wagner, E H
Right arrow Articles by Graham, R M
An assessment of health hazard/health risk appraisal.

E H Wagner, W L Beery, V J Schoenbach and R M Graham

A state-of-the-art review of a widely-used health promotion technique, the health hazard/health risk appraisal (HHA/HRA), was conducted. The review included preparing a 212-item annotated bibliography, compiling an inventory of 217 programs that have used HHA/HRA, holding discussions with HHA/HRA developers and users, conducting formal site visits to 15 HHA/HRA programs, and consultation with experts on epidemiology, biostatistics, and behavioral science as well as developers and users of HHA/HRA. Programs use HHA/HRA primarily as a promotional device, as a tool for structuring education about health-related behaviors, and as a motivational device for stimulating behavioral change. The scientific basis for HHA/HRA risk predictions is problematic, but their arithmetic imprecision is of less concern than insufficiency of the scientific evidence for certain behavioral recommendations, and inaccuracies in client-supplied data. Widely-held beliefs in HHA/HRA's efficacy for motivating behavioral change cannot be substantiated from available evidence, nor can the assumed absence of adverse effects. The importance of this particular health promotion technique appears to have been exaggerated.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Promot PractHome page
J. E. Cowdery, L. S. Suggs, and S. Parker
Application of a Web-Based Tailored Health Risk Assessment in a Work-Site Population
Health Promot Pract, January 1, 2007; 8(1): 88 - 95.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
M. E. Charlson, J. P. Allegrante, P. S. McKinley, J. C. Peterson, C. Boutin-Foster, G. Ogedegbe, and C. R. Young
Improving health behaviors and outcomes after angioplasty: using economic theory to inform intervention
Health Educ. Res., October 1, 2002; 17(5): 606 - 618.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Holist NursHome page
M. F. Williams
The Relationship between Health Habits and Health Interests of Students and Employees in a Nontraditional University
J Holist Nurs, June 1, 1992; 10(2): 110 - 119.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1982 by the American Public Health Association