|
|
||||||||
Project Burn Prevention was designed and implemented to determine the ability of a public education program to increase awareness about burn hazards and reduce the incidence and severity of burn injuries. Media messages were transmitted to residents of a large metropolitan area; separate school and community interventions were implemented in two demographically similar communities within the Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area (SMSA). A second metropolitan area and two of its communities served as control sites. Messages for specific, high-risk age groups emphasized flame burns because of their severity and scalds because of their frequency. Knowledge gains were demonstrable only as a result of the school program. Neither the school program nor the media campaign reduced burn incidence or severity; the community intervention may have brought about a moderate, temporary reduction in injuries. Multiplicity of messages, brevity of the campaign, and separation of the interventions are among possible reasons for the program's failure to significantly reduce burn injuries. Education for personal responsibility is not sufficient. Product modification and environmental redesign must be instituted through education and legislation for successful control of burn injuries.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L Arai, K Roen, H Roberts, and J Popay It might work in Oklahoma but will it work in Oakhampton? Context and implementation in the effectiveness literature on domestic smoke detectors Inj. Prev., June 1, 2005; 11(3): 148 - 151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C. Gielen and D. Sleet Application of Behavior-Change Theories and Methods to Injury Prevention Epidemiol. Rev., August 1, 2003; 25(1): 65 - 76. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C Jaye, J C Simpson, and J D Langley Barriers to safe hot tap water: results from a national study of New Zealand plumbers Inj. Prev., December 1, 2001; 7(4): 302 - 306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F P Rivara Burns: the importance of prevention Inj. Prev., December 1, 2000; 6(4): 243 - 244. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. DiGuiseppi and J. P T Higgins Systematic review: Systematic review of controlled trials of interventions to promote smoke alarms Arch. Dis. Child., May 1, 2000; 82(5): 341 - 348. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
C. DiGuiseppi, S. Slater, I. Roberts, L. Adams, M. Sculpher, A. Wade, and M. McCarthy The "Let's Get Alarmed!" initiative: a smoke alarm giveaway programme Inj. Prev., September 1, 1999; 5(3): 177 - 182. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Warda, M. Tenenbein, and M. E K Moffatt House fire injury prevention update. Part II. A review of the effectiveness of preventive interventions Inj. Prev., September 1, 1999; 5(3): 217 - 225. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. King, M. Thomas, K. Gatenby, A. Georgiou, and M. Hua "First Aid for Scalds" campaign: reaching Sydney's Chinese, Vietnamese, and Arabic speaking communities Inj. Prev., June 1, 1999; 5(2): 104 - 108. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Warda, M. Tenenbein, and M. E K Moffatt House fire injury prevention update. Part I. A review of risk factors for fatal and non-fatal house fire injury Inj. Prev., June 1, 1999; 5(2): 145 - 150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. P. Rivara Pediatric Injury Control in 1999: Where Do We Go From Here? Pediatrics, April 1, 1999; 103(4): 883 - 888. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
F. P. Rivara, D. C. Grossman, and P. Cummings Injury Prevention- Second of Two Parts N. Engl. J. Med., August 28, 1997; 337(9): 613 - 618. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Application of a Health Education Planning Model To Car Seat Use Health Educ Behav, January 1, 1983; 10(1): 42 - 55. [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |