HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Boone, D J Articles by Dudley, D Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Boone, D J Articles by Dudley, D

Laboratory evaluation and assistance efforts: mailed, on-site and blind proficiency testing surveys conducted by the Centers for Disease Control.

D J Boone, H J Hansen, T L Hearn, D S Lewis and D Dudley

During the last three years, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) has conducted: 1) on-site surveys in which trained personnel visited laboratories that had experienced performance problems in the quarterly mailed proficiency testing (PT) program, reviewing the laboratories' analytical procedures by using carefully referenced samples to determine sources of errors and providing assistance in correcting them; 2) special assistance surveys in which carefully referenced samples were mailed to laboratories that had performed unsatisfactorily in routine mailed PT surveys and then telephone consultations were conducted to correct the problems; and 3) blind surveys in which carefully referenced samples were sent through normal patient sample acquisition routes to assess the actual day-to-day performance capability of the laboratories. Results suggest that on-site surveys by trained laboratory surveyors and special mailed assistance surveys can be very effective in identifying the source of analytical errors in laboratories previously found, through mailed PT surveys, to have performance problems. Blind-survey results indicate that good performance in mailed PT does not necessarily imply good laboratory performance with routine patient specimens. Although difficult to conduct, blind surveys should be conducted whenever the logistics can be worked out by contractors for laboratory services, clinicians using laboratory services, and the laboratories themselves to assure the continuation of quality service.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. A. Reilly, I. F. Salkin, M. R. McGinnis, S. Gromadzki, L. Pasarell, M. Kemna, N. Higgins, and M. Salfinger Evaluation of Mycology Laboratory Proficiency Testing J. Clin. Microbiol., July 1, 1999; 37(7): 2297 - 2305. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				T. M. Stull, T. L. Hearn, J. S. Hancock, J. H. Handsfield, and C. L. Collins Variation in Proficiency Testing Performance by Testing Site JAMA, February 11, 1998; 279(6): 463 - 467. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. M. Harris and L. L. Heft Alcohol and Drug Use in the Workplace: Issues, Controversies, and Directions for Future Research Journal of Management, June 1, 1992; 18(2): 239 - 266. [Abstract] [PDF]