HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Earp, J A Articles by Strogatz, D S Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Earp, J A Articles by Strogatz, D S

The effects of family involvement and practitioner home visits on the control of hypertension.

J A Earp, M G Ory and D S Strogatz

The effectiveness of two social support strategies designed to lower hypertensive patients' blood pressure were compared to each other and to a control group (N = 63) receiving routine care in a randomized clinical trial extending over a period of two years. Group 1 (N = 99) received visits and had family members actively participate in their care through home blood pressure monitoring; Group 2 (N = 56) received home visits from nurses and pharmacists. All groups were predominantly Black. After the first year of the trial, the proportion of patients with uncontrolled diastolic blood pressure (greater than or equal to 95mm Hg) had declined significantly for all three groups; no group showed a statistically significant advantage. However, during the last six months of the second year (after visiting had ended), both Groups 1 and 2 demonstrated clear superiority in DBP control over Group 3, achieving borderline statistical significance (p = .07) when multivariable analysis was performed to control for potential confounders. Supplementing routine care with periodic home visits produced an additional 21 per cent of patients with well-controlled DBP, while involving family members plus visits produced a 17 per cent improvement in the percentage of patients with DBP less than 95mm Hg. However, neither support strategy was clearly more effective than the other over time. The efficacy of the interventions is discussed with respect to cost and feasibility of implementation.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. P Cappuccio, S. M Kerry, L. Forbes, and A. Donald Blood pressure control by home monitoring: meta-analysis of randomised trials BMJ, July 17, 2004; 329(7458): 145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Cheng, W.-m. Hui, and S.-k. Lam Coping With First-Time Endoscopy for a Select Sample of Chinese Patients With Functional Dyspepsia and Duodenal Ulcer: An Observational Study Psychosom Med, November 1, 2002; 64(6): 867 - 873. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. E. Walsh and S. J. McPhee A Systems Model of Clinical Preventive Care: An Analysis of Factors Influencing Patient and Physician Health Educ Behav, July 1, 1992; 19(2): 157 - 175. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. S. Zimmerman and C. Connor Health Promotion in Context: The Effects of Significant Others on Health Behavior Change Health Educ Behav, January 1, 1989; 16(1): 57 - 75. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. E. Morisky, N. M. DeMuth, M. Field-Fass, L. W. Green, and D. M. Levine Evaluation of Family Health Education to Build Social Support for Long-Term Control of High Blood Pressure Health Educ Behav, January 1, 1985; 12(1): 35 - 50. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. H. Gottlieb and L. W. Green Life Events, Social Network, Life-Style, and Health: An Analysis of the 1979 National Survey of Personal Health Practices and Consequences Health Educ Behav, January 1, 1984; 11(1): 91 - 105. [Abstract] [PDF]