AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 71, Issue 4 420-422, Copyright © 1981 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cernada, G P
Right arrow Articles by Cernada, C C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cernada, G P
Right arrow Articles by Cernada, C C
Verbal judgments of Taiwanese family planning field workers about induced abortion.

G P Cernada and C C Cernada

Four hundred female governmental family planning field workers in Taiwan were asked by questionnaire whether women should or should not have an induced abortion under certain circumstances. Major findings were that although most workers were favorable to induced abortion under most circumstances, many were unfavorable when marital status, parity, and contraceptive usage of the woman were considered. Furthermore, cumulative judgment scales were shown to exist which have important implications for program approaches elsewhere.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1981 by the American Public Health Association