AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 70, Issue 6 586-592, Copyright © 1980 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Muller, A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Muller, A
Evaluation of the costs and benefits of motorcycle helmet laws.

A Muller

Since 1976, 28 states have repealed or significantly amended their motorcycle helmet laws. The change in legislation was not based on an evaluation of the costs and benefits of such laws. This paper attempts such an assessment by comparing the cost of motorcycle helmets with the medical costs averted due to helmet use using data primarily based on motorcycle crashes in Colorado, Oklahoma, and South Dakota. Nationwide, at least $61 million could be saved annually if all motorcyclists were to use helmets. Helmet law repeals have been observed to lead to a 40 to 50 per cent point reduction in helmet use. The associated additional medical care costs substantially exceed cost savings produced by reduced helmet use. It is estimated that helmet law repeals may produce annually between $16 and 18 million of unnecessary medical care expenditures. Several alternatives to increase motorcycle helmet use are briefly discussed. It is concluded that helmet laws are effective in encouraging helmet use among motorcyclists and will prevent unnecessary medical expenditures as well as unnecessary pain and suffering among injured motorcyclists.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Asia Pac J Public HealthHome page
A.A. Hyder, H. Waters, T. Phillips, and J. Rehwinkel
The state of lipid control in patients with diabetes in a public health care centre.
Asia Pac J Public Health, January 1, 2007; 19(3): 16 - 21.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Inj. Prev.Home page
J. Ferrando, A. Plasencia, M. Oros, C. Borrell, and J. F Kraus
Impact of a helmet law on two wheel motor vehicle crash mortality in a southern European urban area
Inj. Prev., September 1, 2000; 6(3): 184 - 188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Inj. Prev.Home page
A. Skalkidou, E. Petridou, F. C Papadopoulos, N. Dessypris, and D. Trichopoulos
Factors affecting motorcycle helmet use in the population of Greater Athens, Greece
Inj. Prev., December 1, 1999; 5(4): 264 - 267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eval RevHome page
J. P. Goldstein
The Effect of Motorcycle Helmet Use On the Probability of Fatality and the Severity of Head and Neck Injuries: A Latent Variable Framework
Eval Rev, June 1, 1986; 10(3): 355 - 375.
[Abstract] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1980 by the American Public Health Association