AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 69, Issue 9 931-935, Copyright © 1979 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Banta, H D
Right arrow Articles by Thacker, S B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Banta, H D
Right arrow Articles by Thacker, S B
Policies toward medical technology: the case of electronic fetal monitoring.

H D Banta and S B Thacker

Electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) is an example of a medical technology that has been widely accepted since its introduction in the mid-1960s. However, review of the literature does not provide convincing evidence of EFM efficacy, and four recent, controlled, clinical trails show little if any benefit in terms of preventing death or long-term disability of the baby. Public and private policies have largely acted to encourage use of EFM, and none have acted to slow or prevent its spread. This need for mechanisms to assure the timely evaluation of new medical technologies before they are accepted as a medical practice has led to a new medical devices program in the Food and Drug Administration, consensus development groups at the National Institutes of Health, and congressional legislation to establish a new National Center for Health Care Technology.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
E. M. Graham, S. M. Petersen, D. K. Christo, and H. E. Fox
Intrapartum Electronic Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring and the Prevention of Perinatal Brain Injury.
Obstet. Gynecol., September 1, 2006; 108(3): 656 - 666.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
West J Nurs ResHome page
B. J. Hoerst and J. Fairman
Social and Professional Influences of the Technology of Electronic Fetal Monitoring on Obstetrical Nursing
West J Nurs Res, June 1, 2000; 22(4): 475 - 491.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health (London)Home page
I. D. Graham
Processes of change in obstetrics: a cross-national case-study of episiotomy
Health (London) , October 1, 1998; 2(4): 403 - 433.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1979 by the American Public Health Association