HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Elwood, T W Articles by Lieberman, S Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Elwood, T W Articles by Lieberman, S

Comparative educational approaches to screening for colorectal cancer.

T W Elwood, A Erickson and S Lieberman

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the public's willingness to perform the do-it-yourself Hemoccult Test for colon-rectum cancer and to assess the relative effectiveness of alternative means of persuading people to do the test. American Cancer Society volunteers in four different part of the country contacted a total of 11,115 members of the American Association of Retired Persons, using five methods that differed in the extent of personal and impersonal contact involved. Other variables such as inclusion of postage and dietary restrictions were studied and cost efficiencies were estimated. The Group Meeting Method was the most effective personal distribution method. The Selective Mail-Out Method was the most effective impersonal method. The return rate was higher when postage was provided. Dietary restrictions did not markedly reduce participation. Including digital examinations did not affect the return rate. The findings suggest that the Hemoccult Test has the potential of reaching a significant proportion of the nation's older population.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. E. Basch, R. L. Wolf, C. H. Brouse, C. Shmukler, A. Neugut, L. T. DeCarlo, and S. Shea Telephone Outreach to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening in an Urban Minority Population Am J Public Health, December 1, 2006; 96(12): 2246 - 2253. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Provenzale and R. N. Gray Colorectal Cancer Screening and Treatment: Review of Outcomes Research J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, October 1, 2004; 2004(33): 45 - 55. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. R. Church, M. W. Yeazel, R. M. Jones, L. K. Kochevar, G. D. Watt, S. J. Mongin, J. E. Cordes, and D. Engelhard A Randomized Trial of Direct Mailing of Fecal Occult Blood Tests To Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening J Natl Cancer Inst, May 19, 2004; 96(10): 770 - 780. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. E. Walsh and J. P. Terdiman Colorectal Cancer Screening: Clinical Applications JAMA, March 12, 2003; 289(10): 1297 - 1302. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]