|
|
||||||||
A multidisciplinary group has developed a health index questionnaire designed to measure the social, emotional, and physical function of free-living populations. The strategy has been found to be generally applicable, capable of application by lay interviewers, acceptable to interviewees, and amenable to index construction. Furthermore, initial evaluations of the resulting health indices suggest that they are biologically and clinically valid. These health indices have been successfully applied in a randomized trial of innovative primary care services. The comceptualization of individual sections of the health index questionnaire for each of these three functional areas, the generation of the instrument, and the evaluation of questionnaire responses for their biologic and clinical validity are summarized here.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
U. Nanda and E. M. Andresen Health-Related Quality of Life: A Guide for the Health Professional Eval Health Prof, June 1, 1998; 21(2): 179 - 215. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. D. Wolinsky, K. W. Wyrwich, N. A. Nienaber, and W. M. Tierney Generic versus Disease-Specific Health Status Measures: An Example Using Coronary Artery Disease and Congestive Heart Failure Patients Eval Health Prof, June 1, 1998; 21(2): 216 - 243. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. E. Strauss, T. Fortin, P. Hartigan, E. D. Folland, and A. F. Parisi A Comparison of Quality of Life Scores in Patients With Angina Pectoris After Angioplasty Compared With After Medical Therapy : Outcomes of a Randomized Clinical Trial Circulation, October 1, 1995; 92(7): 1710 - 1719. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |