AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 67, Issue 10 946-953, Copyright © 1977 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peters, R. K.
Right arrow Articles by Porter, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Peters, R. K.
Right arrow Articles by Porter, D.
Daily Relaxation Response Breaks in a Working Population: I. Effects on Self-reported Measures of Health, Performance, and Well-being

Ruanne K. Peters, Herbert Benson and Douglas Porter

An experiment conducted at the corporate offices of a manufacturing firm investigated the effects of daily relaxation breaks on five self-reported measures of health, performance, and well-being. For 12 weeks, 126 volunteers filled out daily records and reported bi-weekly for additional measurements. After four weeks of baseline monitoring, they were divided randomly into three groups: Group A was taught a technique for producing the relaxation response; Group B was instructed to sit quiety; Group C received no instructions. Groups A and B were asked to take two 15-minute relaxation breaks daily. After an eight-week experimental period, the greatest mean improvements on every index occurred in Group A; the least improvements occurred in Group C; Group B was intermediate. Differences between the mean changes in Groups A vs C reached statistical significance (p < 0.05) on four of the five indices: Symptoms, Illness Days, Performance, and Sociability-Satisfaction. Improvements on the Happiness-Unhappiness Index were not significantly different among the three groups. The relationship between amount of change and rate of practicing the relaxation response was different for the different indices. While less than three practice periods per week produced little change on any index, two daily sessions appeared to be more practice than was necessary for many individuals to achieve positive changes. Somatic symptoms and performance responded with less practice of the relaxation response than did behavioral symptoms and measures of well-being. (Am. J. Public Health 67:946-953,1977)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Human RelationsHome page
D. Bunce and M. A. West
Stress Management and Innovation Interventions at Work
Human Relations, February 1, 1996; 49(2): 209 - 232.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Health Educ BehavHome page
R. P. Sloan
Workplace Health Promotion: A Commentary on the Evolution of a Paradigm
Health Educ Behav, January 1, 1987; 14(2): 181 - 194.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Health Educ BehavHome page
K. R. McLeroy, L. W. Green, K. D. Mullen, and V. Foshee
Assessing the Effects of Health Promotion in Worksites: A Review of the Stress Program Evaluations
Health Educ Behav, January 1, 1984; 11(4): 379 - 401.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Health Educ BehavHome page
Application of a Health Education Planning Model To Car Seat Use
Health Educ Behav, January 1, 1983; 10(1): 42 - 55.
[PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1977 by the American Public Health Association